The turnout at the open testimony in Trenton, NJ yesterday was terrific!
Here’s a round up of a few articles, blog posts, and written and videotaped testimony that we’ve collected. You may also see more on the Montclair Cares About Schools or Save Our Schools New Jersey Facebook pages or via Montclair Education Matters blog.
Sarah Tepper Blaine, Montclair parent
Colleen Daly Martinez, Montclair parent
And 2nd grade student Saige Price:
Special Ed. parents, take note:
Testimony at Trenton yesterday from Allendale, NJ parent, Julie Larrea Borst:
It was a really good day at the State Board of Ed meeting. Some very good testimony provided by teachers, admins, students, and parents. Here’s mine:
7 January 2015
Good afternoon, my name is Julie Borst. I am a resident of Allendale and the parent of a special needs student who is currently a sophomore in an out of district placement at Pascack Hills HS in Montvale.
I am co-founder of Allendale Parents of Children with Special Needs; an organizer for both Save Our Schools-NJ and United Opt Out-NJ; a member of Ridgewood Cares About Schools; and a member of New Jersey BATs. My comments today are my own.
I am here to discuss the impact of standardized testing on students with disabilities. With the recent announcement of the PARCC exams as a graduation requirement, NJDOE and NJBOE have a responsibility to our most vulnerable students to provide an alternate path to graduation. The choice between PARCC, SAT and ACT is not an actual choice for students who are not performing at or even near grade level.
The continued mincing of words, “there is no ‘opt out’ available in NJ” is causing confusion for parents who are new to this process; and the statement is misleading. While the proper language is “refuse,” no parent should have to be faced with understanding that nuance. When a parent chooses to exercise their 14th Amendment rights, districts, NJDOE, and NJBOE should be supporting that decision, not having a play with words.
I urge you all to consider the “appropriateness” of standardized testing for these students. Is it appropriate to subject a student who educationally operates at a 5th grade level to 10th grade test? If that question was asked about a 5th grade student being required to take a 10th grade test, everyone would laugh and say it’s unthinkable. It’s absurd to even consider it. So why is that same logic not applied to our most vulnerable students?
I won’t even get into the absurdity of the “PARCC Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: (which states) Because a student’s disability may affect how well he or she does on the test, accommodations can be used to overcome or cancel the
effects of the disability…” It’s statements like this that make it impossible to take PARCC seriously.
Now, let’s presume there is no way out for SWDs taking PARCC in order to get a diploma. Then what? As a parent, my goal is to get my daughter as prepared as possible to enter the adult world as a functioning member of society. No standardized test going to help her become that person. Especially if there is no way for her to earn a diploma, the bare minimum needed to obtain a job.
There must be alternatives for PARCC and for graduation requirements. They must be offered in a timely and concise manner as this now affects this year’s juniors. Any alternatives, like portfolios, must be done in such a way as to not overtax teachers’ time. As of January 6, 2015, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no guidance for Special Services Teams on portfolios. We’re already four months into this school year and this is unacceptable.
There must be guidance on these issues and soon.
Thank you for your time.
This opinion piece (not part of Trenton testimony) on why the “reforms” are so hurtful:
Lastly, here’s a list of 12 reasons to oppose the PARCC from SOSNJ and which was published just before Christmas.
That’s it for now.
Stay warm, everyone!
All of us at Montclair Voices